Publication order
The “Scientific and Technical Volga region Bulletin” Editorial Board takes into consideration only original articles in Russian that have never been published before.
Articles offered for the publication in the journal are to be reviewed. The Editorial Board makes a decision on the article publication based on a review prepared by a specialist in the current scientific area, who has a degree. The Editorial Board has a right to reject an article or return it for improvement.
Attribution and scope of copyright over the published materials are determined by the current legislation of the Russian Federation. Any articles or extracts of them are allowed to be distributed via electronic networks, but only with the link to the original source. It is forbidden for outside organizations and persons to publish the journal materials in print and electronic media without the permission of the Editorial Board.
The following documents are to be submitted to the Editorial Board:
- scanned review by the specialist in this field of science, signed and sealed, including reviewer’s degree indication.
- Relevance.
- The scientific novelty.
- The main results of the study.
- The presence or absence of plagiarism in an article.
- Notes reviewer there or not (if you have — you must specify which).
- Wait for practical use (practical purpose), the importance of solving the problem.
- Ability to implementation;
- scanned extract from the department meeting report, signed by the Head of the Department;
- Registration form;
- an article, prepared according to the rules of article formalization in electronic form;
- scanned receipt confirming the payment of the article's publication.
These documents should be emailed to
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
. It is also an email address for the correspondence with the editors. Phone number: 8 (843) 216-30-35,
Reviewing procedure
The procedure of reviewing the articles that are submitted for publication in the
1. All received articles are to be reviewed necessarily.
2. Chief Editor Deputy defines the article conformity to journal’s area and formalization requirements and sends it to a specialist, who has a PhD degree and a proper scientific specialization.
3. Reviewers are notified that the manuscripts are the private property of the authors and contain information that cannot be disclosed. Reviewers are not allowed to copy the articles. Reviews are confidential.
4. The review deadline is determined by the executive secretary of the series.
5. Reviews must contain:
- whether the content of the article corresponds with its title;
- how the article corresponds with the modern achievements in the field of science;
- how materials are presented;
- reasonability of publishing the article;
- advantages and disadvantages of the article.
6. Reviewing is anonymous. The review can be given to the author on his written request and on the request in HAC (VAK) without the reviewer’s signature, name and position.
7. If the review contains recommendations for the correction or improvement of the article, the executive secretary sends it back to the author with a proposal to take the recommendations into account while preparing a new article. Improved articles are to be reviewed again.
8. The final decision on publication is made by the Editorial Board and is recorded in the protocol of the Editorial Board meeting.
9. After the decision is made, the executive secretary informs the author about it and indicates the publication date.
10. The originals of the reviews are stored for five years.
11. Revised Edition sends copies of submissions to authors reviews or a grounded refusal, and also undertakes to send copies of reviews in the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation when entering the revision request.
12. All reviewers are recognized specialists on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have in the past three years, publications on the reviewed article.